It’s Over
April 4th, 2008 Posted in UncategorizedIn a second-half which was eerily similar to the complete collapse of the 2005-06 team, the Vancouver Canucks failed to qualify for the playoffs. Their last ten games saw four wins and six losses, and more importantly, they won only one of their last seven. Amidst all that, the only question Canuck fans seem to be asking is “What happened?”
It’s clear Roberto Luongo could not duplicate the tremendous season he had last year. Markus Naslund, the team captain and leader, as hard as he tried, could not answer the call. Their blueline was seemingly incapable of staying healthy for any stretch of games. In other words, the worst that could go wrong did go wrong.
And now it’s over, just like that. Division champs? Not even a playoff team. Roberto Luongo’s amazing three-game shutout streak in November? It means nothing when you don’t make the postseason. Even the outstanding and super awesome play of Mike ‘Micro-Weave’ Weaver was not enough for the Canucks to qualify …
I look at the standings, and I don’t ask myself “What happened?”. Instead, I dwell on the question of “What if?”
What if the Canucks had beaten the Oilers in a couple more shootouts this season? What if Nonis had traded the likes of Kesler and Bourdon for Brad Richards at the deadline? What if Morrison hadn’t been so ridiculously injury-riddled? What if Peter Forsberg had not come back to Colorado to completely own the Canucks in all three games he played against them? What if the blueline had managed to stay healthy? What if Trevor Linden played in all 82? Dare I say, what if Roberto Luongo didn’t need to have his mind fixated on the birth of his child?
Too many to answer, not enough to ask. And the problem is, there are more questions being asked then ever at this point, which seems ironic since there seemed to be the same amount asked at the beginning of the Canuck season. And the burden of answering those questions will lie with Dave Nonis, Alain Vigneault, and all of Canuck management.
Where do they go from here? Will there finally be more scoring help next season? Do you believe in Vigneault’s coaching system of dump and chase, defense first? Do we bring back Markus Naslund and Brendan Morrison, or is it time to bury the old Crawford-Burke regime?
Quite simply, it’s difficult for the typical Canuck fan to come to a decision: Are we supposed to be angry and upset about our missed opportunities, or are we supposed to be excited about the possibilities for this offseason?
In the meantime, October seems oh so far away, and it looks like fans on the Pacific are going to need to find someone to cheer for in the postseason, because, for the second time in three seasons, it won’t be the Vancouver Canucks.


6 Responses to “It’s Over”
By Jay on Apr 4, 2008
sigh, I don’t know what to say! I really beleive that they tried their best. It’s a tricky thing those professional athletes. There is such a mind game with, and it’s not just all talent and mental focus. We all know this.
Yes we could be angry, and hell they tried their best. I think it’s time for big change though. If naslund and morrison want to stay, they have to take a massive pay-cut imo.
By Hora on Apr 4, 2008
First of all I don’t think there’s enough talent on this team when it comes to scoring. The Sedins would be the best second line in the NHL, but I don’t think they cut it for a line 1. Especially if you want to win the playoffs.
They just didn’t have heart. This season blew. There’s too many things to say, and I don’t feel like saying them right now.
EXCEPT: MATT! Learn to categorize your posts you n00b. You fail.
By Leon on Apr 4, 2008
BRING BACK ANSON CARTER. or someone less black and can score just as much. okay. with that aside though, our unhealthy D and collapse of the sedin sisters after the all star break was what really killed us i think… naslund and mo will probably be gone.. but i personally wouldnt mind if they came back for a lot less. strip the C from naslund though, its obvious the team doesnt play with enough desire
By Matt on Apr 4, 2008
I’m surprised no one here has given MIKE WEAVER his props. Would you guys like to see Weaver back next season?
By Andy on Apr 4, 2008
Being a Canuck fan is stressful. I remember someone on Sportsnet making a point saying he had never seen the Nucks play such bad hockey in the longest time and I can’t but help to agree. Watching this team this year, i dunno…it missed enthusiasm and maybe heart? Something was missing (other than the obvious).
We had the best goalie in the world on our side and we still failed. When we had the best line in the world, we failed as well. I guess it wasn’t meant to be this year…just like the past 14 years.
By Raph on Apr 5, 2008
This is extremely similar to the 05/06 season the Canucks had. I believe we have had the worst luck of all teams in the NHL since the lockout. For the second time in three years, we have been “one of the best to miss the playoffs”. And by the years since the lockout, I am referring to the new NHL scheduling system. I mean come on… Nashville gets to play against the measley Chicago, St. Louis, and Columbus 8 times each, While all of our divisional games are tough battles.
And by the way, I agree with Matt. I’d like to see Mike Weaver back. Some may not agree with me on this one, but I’d also want to see Aaron Miller back too.